And they’re off…

The day came upon us at last. I took Night Visions and Patience to the airport early this a.m. to begin winging their way toward a distant and mysterious land where they will be ministering to abandoned children. There will be but mere hours left in this month before I see them again.

There is little concern for their physical safety, but they will be operating under conditions that are environmentally and politically…problematic. For those and other reasons I will be general in describing where they’re going and what they’ll be doing (even after they return) because there is much good work that is at risk. It will be a life-changing experience for both of them, and perhaps for many others as well.

It may even be life-changing for me. It will certainly be routine-busting. I’ll get a taste of single-parenthood and my own cooking, and will have occasion, I’m sure, to wonder what happened to the mysterious elves that pick up after me (I hope my wife didn’t take them with her).

It’s not an easy thing to send them off, though it may appear to some as if I do so lightly. We’re a very close family and appreciate what we have…and at times I perhaps guard it too jealously as if I were the only defense, forgetting the limits of my powers. My wife and I, however, consider ourselves stewards of all that we have received from God, including (especially) our children, knowing that while they may be ours, they are indeed meant for others. And so have they been raised.

This trip has been on Patience’s heart for three years since she first heard the first-hand accounts from a friend of ours of this foreign land and of the children being lost. She knew, one day, she would go. When the door opened unexpectedly this year her path was clear, her resolve was strong and her age irrelevant. Her mother, too, felt the undeniable tug. Certainly suffering is everywhere and confronting it doesn’t require a passport and innoculations, but for this particular time and for this particular place, this is where they know they are to be. I had every right and every instinct to go with them, but not the release, so now I am where I need to be.

Let’s see what happens.

We’ve got spirit, how ’bout you?

Jay Rosen is reading about and hearing from all the activists gearing up to spend big money on the upcoming battle over Supreme Court nominees and doesn’t know what it is good for.

In the last election, 121 million votes were cast, and each one of those people could (in theory) be influenced by a media campaign. On the coming nomination, 100 United States Senators vote. Can they be influenced in the same way? The press is saying: yeah, they can. But it cannot be so.

It’s a good point in so far as groups on both sides pouring money into television commercials and other events should have little direct effect on the votes of 100 senators. Of course, it’s not about influencing voters but about rallying the faithful. This is going to be the Super Bowl of politics this year and what’s a big game without cheerleaders and rowdy fans to inspire their team and intimidate the opposition? The back-and-forth is merely the political version of the old “We’ve got spirit, yes we do, we’ve got spirit how ’bout you?” chant. Even though the Dems and their fanatics will – like the old AFL in the pre-merger Super Bowls – be trying to show they’re relevant, they have to feel encouraged that some Republicans have shown themselves to be easily intimidated.

Therefore the orchestrated cheering has already begun, and from the Left I hear chestnuts such as:

Here we go, Moonbats, here we go!

Babies don’t vote! Babies don’t vote!

2-4-6-8 – who’s character do we assassinate?

Filibuster! Filibuster! Don’t invoke cloture! We’ve got war, for the culture!

Ree, ree, ree, attack the nominee!
Ras, ras, ras, our thumb is in our …

Even though President Bush has suggested that we all play nice, I wouldn’t mind some New York-style hazing, ala the Daryl Strawberry era, when Chuck Schumer gets up to flap his gums. Can’t you just hear the crowd sing-songing, “Schooo-merrr! Schooo-merrr!” Or how about these cheers and chants from the Right:

Hey-hey, ho-ho, reconstructionists got to go!

Teddy, Teddy, he’s all wet!

Elections have consequences! Elections have consequences!

Give me another S! Give me another C! Give me another A! Give me another L! Give me another I! Give me another A! What’s that spell!

And could it be any sweeter when it’s all over than for the Righties to taunt the Left with “Here comes the judge! Here comes the judge!”?

Of course, the insiders refer to all of this as “activating the base,” which really means “getting the base to cough up even more money.” After all, what’s a Super Bowl without commercials?

Of hidden standards and agendas

Two of the most recent Supreme Court decisions appear to be on unrelated subjects but I think there is a common theme. In going halfsies on the two Ten Commandment cases before them the court essentially said that displaying the Ten Commandments in or around government buildings was okay as long as they could be considered as historical artifacts and not as something the government says you should live by.

And in their emminent domain-related Kelo decision the court said the same thing about the U.S. Constitution.

There has been a lot of great writing on other blogs about these decisions already, especially on Kelo, and I don’t have much to add in terms of ramifications and analyses. I do have a couple of observations on what I see as the underlying issue before us, however. (If you want ramifications and analyses, I especially liked these postings from Sprucegoose and from Craig Westover.)

Both the Constitution and the Ten Commandments have similar objectives: both set out how we should relate to one another, while the Commandments described how we should relate to God and the Constitution laid out how our government should relate to us. Part of the idea was that following the principles in each would result in a happier, more peaceful and more prosperous life, and that by putting these principles in writing we could hope to avoid large scale abuses of individuals tring to shade these for their own advantage.

Aside from prohibitions on killing, stealing, perjury and the occasional Sunday blue law that may be in effect in some areas, there aren’t a lot of laws on the books enforcing the Commandments. That’s not to say that putting some teeth into the “honoring your father and mother” line wouldn’t be generally beneficial to society. Enforcing that part about “not coveting” however would probably cripple the economy. Still, their presence in the public square and in our awareness established that – however unattainable – there is a standard of right and wrong to aspire that goes beyone legal and illegal. In my opinion, those who find the Commandments offensive are offended more by the suggestion that there should be such a standard of behavior (other than their own) than by the mention of God.

The Constitution, on the other hand, has given birth to thousands of laws, each supposedly adhering to its standard to provide fair play in a world that becomes increasingly ingenious about playing unfairly.

Both the Commandments and the Constitution ultimately depend on an understanding that justice is available, consistent and to be expected. In their recent decisions the Supreme Court has chosen to hide one standard from sight while ignoring the other.

You don’t have to win, but you do have to fight

Do you remember your first punch in the nose?

I think most guys can. I didn’t have a particularly violent childhood but it had its share of slugs, kicks, slaps, bites, dutch rubs and indian rope burns. All these were pretty much the expected and accepted currency of rough and tumble boyhood. Still I wasn’t prepared for the discombobulation of taking the first shot to the snotlocker. It was painful, disorienting and effectively short-circuited my offensive efforts in the fight. For that matter, it didn’t do a lot for my defensive efforts either. Ultimately the pain went away before the humiliation did. What lasted, however, was an understanding that that type of blow, while shocking, isn’t fatal. I would get hit in the nose a couple of more times before I became an “adult” and was able to do better than just persevere in those episodes.

I thought back to these experiences today while reading Michelle Malkin’s “Land of the Meek” post and her related “Namby Pamby Nation” column. Here’s an excerpt from the column:

The left-wing Kumbaya crowd is quietly grooming a generation of pushovers in the public schools. At a time of war, when young Americans should be educated about this nation’s resilience and steely resolve, educators are indoctrinating students with saccharine-sticky lessons on “non-violent conflict resolution” and “promoting constructive dialogues.”

Peaceniks are covering our kids from head to toe in emotional bubble wrap. They are creating a nation of namby-pambys.

The latest example of Hand-Holding 101 comes from the New York City public schools. According to Lauren Collins of The New Yorker magazine, the school system is introducing a new curriculum called “Operation Respect: Don’t Laugh at Me” into all of its elementary and middle schools. The program is now used in at least 12,000 schools and camps across the country.

Ostensibly, the program helps kids deal with petty meanness and name-calling from insensitive classmates. Not by instructing them in self-defense, mind you, but by inflating their self-esteem.

Now, I generally support non-violence. Despite what you may assume from the way I opened this post, my mother raised me not to fight and not to hit; especially where my younger brother and sister were concerned. “You’re bigger than they are, and it’s not right.” I tried to live up to her standard, and suffered the sanctions when I couldn’t. But along with that came the sense that I shouldn’t let other big people pound on littler people either.

There was a time when my brother was in junior high when some larger classmates of his conducted an ongoing taunting campaign against him. When this escalated to ganging up on him physically, an intervention was discussed at the dinner table that night. Somewhat to our surprise, my father indicated there would be no parental involvement: if we wanted to send a message we’d have to do it ourselves. “You don’t have to win,” he said, “but you do have to fight. If you don’t let them know there’s a price to pay this will never end.” That might not be word for word, given the years that have passed, but the meaning is still clear to me today.

The next day we waded into them (a couple of the younger guys were every bit my size)…and we won. The next day, and the day after that, brought additional skirmishes as other “insurgents” sought their own revenge, but we continued to prevail and by the end of the week peace reigned in the neighborhood. I did have to endure a mother hen cursing me out from her front porch while her six-foot “chick” skulked nearby in utter mortification, but the look on his face was worth it. Not to mention what it did for my self-esteem.

Read Michelle’s post and the comment string that goes with it for examples from others of how peace at any cost approach is literally hurting kids and leaving them ill-equipped to handle their emotions and and life’s setbacks. As for me, I don’t think I was warped by my experience. I haven’t resorted to physical intimidation or violence to solve a dispute since that time, but the lessons learned from that week and from the punches in the nose I received before then have served me well.

Some say that you can’t live like that today because a fistfight might suddenly turn into a gunfight. There’s certainly evidence to support that. I wonder, though, if the youth today had been allowed to scrap more when they were younger – if they had learned that respect sometimes needs to be earned, not assumed – that the rage that leads to going for a gun might have already been tempered. For me, I learned I wasn’t always going to win, that some people just weren’t going to like me, and that I could take a hit and keep going. It gave me confidence and also taught me how to think under pressure. One last example:

When I was a sophomore in high school my gym class went through the Red Cross life-saving training program. We met in the school pool and learned and practiced techniques for grabbing and controlling drowning swimmers so they could be rescued. When it came time to pass our final exam, our gym teacher invited a couple of seniors who were varsity tackles on the football team to be our “victims”. They were told to resist us in any way they could in order to mimic the panic and unpredictability of a real drowning victim. If we couldn’t “save” them we would get an F for the final.

The tackles, naturally, looked at this as a legal way to beat up on underclassmen. I watched as three or four of my classmates were themselves dragged out of the pool, bruised and bloody. The only thing our teacher said was “Next,” and I realized he meant me. Having been grounded in evolution theory, I may have suggested that we wait and see if my assigned drowning victim would develop gills. (Of course, that would have meant evolution is observable.)

Nevertheless, into the pool I went to grapple with a guy who was big, mean and having a good time. I knew he seriously wanted to hurt my feelings…and anything else he could get his hands on. I suppose if he’d been through “Operation Respect” he might not have acted this way, but odds are you’re going to run into people who slept through the class.

Anyway, instead of swimming up to him and trying to get my arms around his barrel-sized chest in one of the holds we had been taught, I treaded water just outside his reach while he taunted me. When he finally lunged at me I instead wrapped my arms around his head in a way definitely not described in our textbook and proceeded to do everything I could to keep my body between him and the surface of the water.

The agreed upon signal if anyone found themselves in trouble during a “rescue” was to pinch your partner. I waited until I had felt two or three pinches before releasing my grip. When he popped desperately to the surface I took the opportunity to apply a more orthodox hold and swam him to the side of the pool – a direction he was now very happy to go. He was heaving, my classmates were cheering and the instructor was hiding his face behind his clipboard so we wouldn’t see him laughing. That seemed to calm things down for the rest of the assignment and we all passed, including the earlier rescuers who were given a second chance. As for the guy I “rescued”, he learned to appreciate the difference between playing at being saved and the real need to be saved. But that’s a blog for another day.

Fathers’ Day: How it all began (for me)

I have a small suitcase in which I keep hard copies of samples of old work projects, ads I’ve created, magazines I’ve edited and the like. Most of it pre-dates my own computer age and hard-drive storage. I wiped the dust off of this case today to look for something, and in the process came across copies of letters I had sent to my parents documenting the pregnancy that would lead to my oldest daughter and their first grandchild, and continuing on for the first seven months or so after Faith was born.

I didn’t even remember writing these letters, let alone shoving copies into the case, but it was a weird feeling to, in essence, receive a letter from my past self.

The series started with the news that we were indeed pregnant, having had an ultrasound at approximately 9 weeks gestation. It was early for such a procedure, but my wife’s Ob-Gyn — having himself performed a tubal ligation on her five years previously (that we hadn’t had undone) — was concerned that she might have a tumor or a tubal pregnancy. Yet the ultrasound definitely showed us a baby with head, arms, legs and hands, right where it was supposed to be. The following bulletins were generally short and, while rapturously fascinating to me, would be of little interest to anyone else, I’m sure.

The reason I’m writing about this, however, is because so many details I recorded had faded completely out of my memory. Heavens to Murgatroid – I didn’t remember the way she stuck her top lip out when smiled, or how she’d drag her stuffed frog across her eyes when she was going to sleep, or the sneak attack she staged on her mom’s Banana Flip, or the game we liked to play with her Obo the Clown doll (I didn’t even remember Obo the Clown!), or the origins of my wife’s ongoing healthy dietary habits that took root while she was pregnant. And there were probably countless other details that I didn’t bother to write down because I was sure they were too significant to forget — yet now I have no clue what these might have been. What was the first thing she laughed at? Did she like applesauce? When did she discover shopping?

Today almost 17 years later I sat at a picnic table in a park, pondering and watching Faith and her best friend sitting under a shade tree 50 yards away. When did they become such beauties? What are they talking about? What dreams and schemes are they bending their prodigious wills and talents toward? It was a moment that brought me pause, yet a week from now would I have remembered it? Will I recall a year from now how my heart skipped a beat earlier this evening when I realized she was 15 minutes overdue and hadn’t called?

Perhaps every memory is indeed intact but stored away inside with a “Do Not Open Before 2010” label or something. That’s because now is the time to keep my eyes open to record future memories, rather than closed to review memories. There will be way too much time for that later, and all too soon.

In my father’s house

Here’s one from the vaults: I originally wrote this some 20 years ago, before I was married, before I became a father myself. It’s aged well and I print it again here in remembrance of Father’s Day, but there’s also some more to the story which I’ll share at the end.

A Slice of Night Life

My wife’s sister helps us out by doing housecleaning for us periodically. Not long ago she reported for duty one morning while our family was getting ready for our daily scatter.

When it was time for me to leave the mother ship for the office my wife and eldest daughter were upstairs where my sister-in-law was scrubbing a bathroom sink. I went upstairs. I kissed my wife. I kissed my daughter. I started to leave. This ensued:

Sister-in-law: “Hey, where’s my kiss?”

Night Writer: “Sorry, I try to make it a personal policy not to kiss the help.”

Sister-in-law: “Wha-?”

Wife: “Yeah, but if you were just here as the sister-in-law, then I’m sure you could get a kiss.”

Eldest daughter: (pumping her fist) “JER-ry! JER-ry! JER-ry!”

Sometimes I’m really glad I don’t work from home.

StarTribune: “We’re screwed” – but why?

Today the Strib ran an article headlined “World unprepared for next influenza pandemic: health experts.” The article covered what a panel of experts – including the U’s own Dr. Michael Osterholm – had to say about the likelihood of a catastrophic global avian flu pandemic. Dr. Osterholm’s succinct statement: “We’re screwed.”

Unfortunately, the article did a pretty poor job in putting into context why this threat is significant and what is already being done, so allow me to fill in the gaps. This is a topic I’ve been focusing on for business and personal reasons, and I’ve offered a lot more details, perspective and updates here and here. (Each post also features links to more information from highly credible sources).

The article doesn’t describe why this strain has experts so concerned. Here are the salient details:

Update:

KARE 11 did a more in-depth story on this recently, including more Minnesota angles. You can read the text of the report here.

Thanks, Boss, but isn’t there a better way?

I didn’t take in any shows while in Las Vegas, but I did see a presentation on healthcare trends by futurist Andrew Zolli that was almost as eye-popping. According to Zolli, the price of a typical new car in the U.S. includes about $1,000 in materials…and $1,200 in health insurance costs for the men and women who built it.

One of the most significant factors in the perpetually rising cost of healthcare is the distorting effects of employer- and government-paid health insurance that insulates the market from supply and demand. If you have health insurance today it is most likely an employee benefit from your job, thanks to an act of Congress more than 60 years ago. Today at least 25 congressmen would like to undo that. Before you reach for the tar and feathers, however, allow me excerpt a couple of articles that set the stage.

For a little history, here’s what Karl Zinsmeister wrote in the March issue of The American Enterprise magazine (boldface emphasis mine):

The root of this is very simple–and it is an accident of history. During World War II, while strict wage controls forbade companies from paying higher salaries, firms short on labor grew desperate for ways to attract and keep badly needed workers. They discovered the government would let them pay the health costs of employees as a kind of backdoor substitute for increasing their wages. And health benefits, unlike wages, weren’t taxed, a loophole that made them even more attractive to both workers and companies than cash wage increases. Employer-paid health benefits soon became universal and permanent.

The unforeseen side effect was that it became uneconomic for Americans to buy health care for themselves. Why pay your own doctor and insurance bills with after-tax income when your employer can do it with pre-tax dollars? Soon health care seemed like a “free” entitlement to average Americans. Given that something like 80 or 90 percent of our health care costs are now picked up by someone else, it’s no wonder that medical expenditures in the U.S. have soared to 15 percent of our national income (roughly twice the level of countries like Japan, the U.K., and Italy).

What if those World War II employers had offered instead to pay the grocery bills of their workers? Imagine if today hardly anyone handed his own cash to checkout ladies, but instead a food co-op or insurance company selected by your boss covered the costs of whatever food you consumed. You can be sure that 1) You’d be spending a lot less carefully (and a lot more) on groceries today. 2) You’d have much less individual control over your diet. 3) The grocery and food-provision business would be far less efficient and varied and competitive and cost-controlled–almost certainly it would be one of the more troubled sectors of the U.S. economy.

Hmmm, I wonder if opportunistic politicians might be organizing bus rides for seniors to Canada to buy back bacon? Similarly, do you think you’d be happy if the groceries by government plan required you to spend a large chunk of your “benefit” on groceries you didn’t like and didn’t need, even if you never consumed them?

Doesn’t Play Well With Others

The scene: an “all ages” softball game at a friends and family gathering to celebrate a milestone birthday. The ages run from about six all the way up to geezers like me (those older than me were wise enough to sit it out).

The situation: me, the wily veteran, slow-pitching to all comers and even moving closer to the younger ones so as to present an even more gentle offering. Occasionally the youngsters would hit grounders back into my vicinity that I would field and then – carefully judging distance, speed of runner and accounting for the likelihood that the firstbase-kid could end up with a ball in the face – make an appropriate throw to first that could still result in an out. Sometimes it even worked, but the thing is I tried to make a play…for which I was branded a “big meanie” because I didn’t deliberately throw the ball away or play soccer with it so the runner could be safe.

Such is the lot of a compassionate conservative, I guess. Here I made all kinds of adjustments to the “playing field” to provide equal opportunity for all to compete, only to find what they really wanted was equal outcomes.

They will grow out of this, right?